Message-ID: <9031202.1075858681265.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 08:00:15 -0700 (PDT)
From: c..williams@enron.com
To: d..steffes@enron.com
Subject: RE: SCE Stipulation
Cc: b..sanders@enron.com, michael.tribolet@enron.com, lisa.mellencamp@enron.com, 
	jeff.dasovich@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bcc: b..sanders@enron.com, michael.tribolet@enron.com, lisa.mellencamp@enron.com, 
	jeff.dasovich@enron.com
X-From: Williams, Robert C. </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=RWILLIA2>
X-To: Steffes, James D. </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Jsteffe>
X-cc: Sanders, Richard B. </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rsander>, Tribolet, Michael </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Mtribole>, Mellencamp, Lisa </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Lmellen>, Dasovich, Jeff </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Jdasovic>
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Sanders, Richard B (Non-Privileged)\Sanders, Richard B.\Deleted Items
X-Origin: Sanders-R
X-FileName: Sanders, Richard B (Non-Privileged).pst

i think we've sent a markup to SCE.  i am available today and agree it would be a good idea to meet.  BTW are you available for a call today at 2 CST to discuss strategy for the mon meet and confer with SCE?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Steffes, James D.  
Sent:	Friday, October 26, 2001 9:38 AM
To:	Williams, Robert C.
Cc:	Sanders, Richard B.; Tribolet, Michael; Mellencamp, Lisa; Dasovich, Jeff
Subject:	SCE Stipulation

Bob --

Where do we stand on the SCE stipulation?  I want to make sure that our push in SCE doesn't conflict or contradict something we are doing in the PG&E discussions.

Can we meet today?

Jim